Dr. G. Peyton Neatrour PDF Print E-mail

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Former patient files suit against her eye surgeon

http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=103157&ran=222320

VIRGINIA BEACH - A local eye surgeon has been sued by a former patient who says her vision was made worse by a mishandled procedure performed three years ago.

The lawsuit was filed April 4 in Circuit Court. It says Dr. G. Peyton Neatrour should not have performed the procedure because the patient had a pre-existing cornea condition that was not properly assessed during preoperative screening.

This is the second lawsuit filed this year in Virginia Beach against Neatrour. In February, another patient filed a $1.75 million lawsuit saying Neatrour should not have performed two surgeries on her eyes because "she was not an appropriate candidate … because of her eye structure and condition."

Virginia Beach Circuit -Civil Division

Case Number, Name Details, and Status   Source: Virginia Beach Civil Docket Access (Circuit Court)

Case Number                         Name                                                                                     Status

CL02002300-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, G P; MD                  Plaintiff: JM                        Dismissed
CL06001968-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, G PEYTON; M D        Plaintiff: RM                        Active
CL06000845-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, G PEYTON; MD         Plaintiff: MC                        Active
CL93003687-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, G. PEYTON              Plaintiff: CF                        Dismissed
CL00000134-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, G. PEYTON; M.D.      Plaintiff: WA                       Dismissed
CL03002771-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, GEORGE PEYTON      Plaintiff: RBF, MD                Dismissed
CL05000551-00  Defendant: NEATROUR, GEORGE PEYTON; M.D. Plaintiff: LB Status:          Dismissed

Just because a case was dismissed in the courts, DOES NOT mean the case was without merit. My case is a prime example! Wouldn't be surprised if the 2 active cases aren't dismissed as well...

However, Dr. Neatrour wasn't so lucky in this case: 

PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

VIRGINIA BEACH OPHATHALMOLOGIST G. PEYTON NEATROUR, M.D., AND BEACH EYE CARE, FOUND LIABLE FOR LASIK MALPRACTICE

On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, a jury returned a verdict against G. Peyton Neatrour, M.D., and his professional corporation Beach Eye Care, Inc. (d/b/a/ Neatrour Eye Institute (“NEI”)), for having performed LASIK eye surgery on Rosalind Martinez in December 2002 and May 2003.

Ms. Martinez alleged that she was an improper candidate for either surgery, and was not properly informed of the risks related to her specific condition. In December 2002, her preoperative corneal topographies were irregular. Indeed, the labels printed out by Dr. Neatrour’s own software warned “SUSPECT KERATOCONUS” and “CORNEAL DISTORTION.” In addition, Ms. Martinez alleged she suffered from preoperative dry eye, which was not treated.

After delegating all of the preoperative screening to his staff, and never examining the patient’s eyes himself, he went ahead and performed LASIK surgery.

When Ms. Martinez returned complaining of poor visual acuity and postoperative blurriness, Dr. Neatrour’s optometrist recommended waiting before considering any further surgery. However, Dr. Neatrour forged ahead and performed corrective surgery on her right eye anyway, which only worsened the patient’s cornea condition, postLASIK ectasia.

After 20 visits to NEI, the patient saw Dr. Neatrour for just the third and final time in March 2005. At that time, Dr. Neatrour confirmed that the patient had developed postLASIK ectasia and keratoconus. Still, he offered to perform further corrective surgery on the patient’s left eye, which was clearly contraindicated. Thus, rather than screening unsuitable candidates for LASIK surgery, Ms. Martinez’s lawyer argued in summation that in this case “NEI” did not stand for Neatrour Eye Institute, but rather “Any Eye, Any Time.”

As a result of her visual injuries Ms. Martinez, who is employed as a medical assistant, was stripped of her responsibilities assisting with suturing, after she accidentally cut a patient. She was taking courses to become a surgical nurse, but had to drop out. And, Dr. Neatrour and others have advised that she now requires a corneal transplant.

After eight days of trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict against Dr. Neatrour, and awarded Ms. Martinez $200,000.

Earlier this year, Dr. Neatrour settled another LASIK medical malpractice lawsuit with Mary Carrier for an undisclosed amount.

Ms. Martinez was represented by Todd J. Krouner and Dominique Ferrera from Chappaqua, New York, and local counsel, Thomas Shuttleworth of Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Swain, Haddad & Morecock, P.C. of Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Dr. Neatrour and Beach Eye Care were represented by John Redmond and Rodney Dillman of Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C. of Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Read the complaint or press release.